Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Advanced Technology Identifies "Core" Brain Abnormality in Gulf War Illness


Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes.com

(91outcomes.com) - A discovery by a Minneapolis medical researcher may lead to a new test to help identify Gulf War Illness, a unique disease that affects 250,000 veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, according to official estimates, as well as other U.S. forces.

Using sophisticated brain mapping equipment and techniques called magnetoencephalography (MEG) that looks more like something from a science fiction movie, Dr.  Aposotolos Georgopolous of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center has found a unique visual signature of a “core” brain abnormality in GWI.  
According to Georgopolous, the essence of brain function is communication among neural ensembles, and neural communication is accomplished by ongoing, dynamic interactions among multiple “neuronal ensembles.”  Dr. Georgopolous has used MEG to identify unique visual signatures of the neuron ensembles for an array of other diseases.



Conclusions
Georgopolous’s MEG findings provide further evidence to a large and growing body of objective scientific evidence that shows GWI is a distinctly separate disease entity rooted in damage to, and dysfunction of the brain.  

The findings were presented before the Congressionally chartered Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses (RAC-GWVI) in public meetings this week in Boston, Mass.  

Georgopolous expressed the need for his current study needs to be extended to larger numbers so as to include detailed examination of subgroups with comorbidities -- other diseases and conditions that may also be simultaneously afflicting some GWI patients.  

However, his current findings remain compelling and his unique identification through highly advanced technology of a “core” brain abnormality in GWI has profound implications.  


References:

Georgopolous AP et al (2010), “The Synchronous Neural Interactions Test”

Haley Team Research Finds Further Evidence of Brain Dysfunction, Chemical Damage in Ill Gulf War Veterans


Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes.com

(91outcomes.com)
-  Following on the heels of a presentation of new research findings by Dr. Dane Cook showing powerful objective evidence -- functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) -- of dysfunction in the brains of ill veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, one of the pioneers in the field of Gulf War Illness research presented an overview of findings yesterday that both dovetailed with, and expanded on, Cook’s team’s fMRI findings.

Findings by a large research team led by Dr. Robert Haley, MD, of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, added further confirmation of brain dysfunction in regards to pain processing, cognitive and other functioning in the brains of ill Gulf War veterans.  

Using sophisticated medical research methods, including Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) fMRI, a national survey of more than 8,000, and a week-long inpatient battery of advanced testing of nearly 100 ill Gulf War veterans, Haley’s team successfully to replicated, validated, and expanded on earlier findings that teased out the specifics of brain dysfunction in ill Gulf War veterans.

Haley’s team’s findings were presented during the first morning of two days of public meetings being held this week by the Congressionally chartered Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses (RAC-GWVI) at the Boston University Medical Center in Boston, Mass.


Early Studies

In 1996, medical research findings from a UK scientist (Jamal et al) found a two-fold increase in cooling detection threshold in ill Gulf War veterans, providing some of the first objective evidence of the physiological underpinnings of Gulf War Illness.  

Among the first research related to Gulf War veterans led by Haley was a 1998 medical research study that replicated the 1996 UK study.  This was followed by several studies that looked at possible mechanisms of sensory and pain handling in the brains of ill Gulf War veterans.  All showed objective evidence -- though sometimes difficult to interpret -- of brain dysfunction.


One Syndrome, or Three?

Haley’s definition of Gulf War Illness is unique.  Since the 1990s, he has postulated that there are subsets within Gulf War Illness, an idea that remains controversial today in the scientific community.

Haley’s three GWI subsets are:

  • Syndrome 1: “Impaired Cognition,” a symptom complex characterized by inability to “remember things,” as well as profound fatigue.  
  • Syndrome 2: “Confusion-Ataxia”, a symptom complex that profoundly affects the veteran’s ability to think, comprehend, or interact.  
  • Syndrome 3: “Central Pain,” a symptom complex with chronic widespread pain as its central feature.

Haley said he believes Syndrome 2 and 3 are related, and perhaps different stages of the same disorder, but that he believes Syndrome 1 is something very different from the other two.

However, another of the leading GWI medical researchers argued that the symptom subsets may instead be indvidualized manifestations of the same underlying disease processes.


Pain Processing

Adding further confirmation to Cook’s team’s fMRI brain imagery related to pain processing,  Haley reported that his team saw dramatically more sensitivity (hyperactivation/hyperarousal) with noxious heat pain stimuli in fMRI of Syndrome 1 and Syndrome 2 patients than in controls.  However, the hyperactivation when exposed to noxious heat pain stimuli was inexplicably not present in fMRI of those labeled as Syndrome 3 (chronic pain).  

His team found no difference in fMRI between controls and any of his three Syndromes when exposed to innocuous warm stimulation.  However, the team’s findings in fMRI of Syndromes 1 and 2, which generally have little chronic pain, they had much less brain activation when exposed to innocuous warm stimulation than either controls or Syndrome 3, which is characterized by chronic pain.  
Haley termed the effect in Syndrome 1 and Syndrome 2 of lower than normal pain sensitivity and brain activation to innocuous warm stimulation, but significantly higher than normal pain sensitivity and brain activation to noxious heat pain stimuli, “hypoactivity-hyperarousal” -- objective evidence of brain dysfunction in pain and other processing.  

Different from Fibromyalgia

Haley’s fMRI and other findings differ from other studies of Fibromyalgia (FM) patients.  

In FM, not only does fMRI reveal increased activation in the regions of the brain associated with pain processing when exposed to to noxious heat stimuli, but also to innocuous heat stimuli.  This feeling that virtually everything is more painful than expected is known in medical terms as “allodynia”.  


Brain Chemical Explanation

Haley’s research data suggested that the autonomic dysfunction affected one type of brain chemical effect -- cholinergic -- than another -- adrenergic.  

Haley’s team’s findings found that all three Syndromes had higher scores than controls on the cholinergic symptom scales but not the adrenergic symptom scales.  

Using another advanced testing procedure, QSART, differences were greater in the feet, less in shins and thighs, a pattern that is typical in peripheral nerve involvement.   Haley said this is suggestive that small cholinergic fibers may be dysfunctioning.  

In a study led by Dr. Gail Tillman (et al, 2012), testing of auditory stimuli in fEEG protocol found abnormal functioning of the cholinergic inhibitory (filtering), or “gating of ascending sensory impulses in the RAS of the brainstem.”  

Of note, several other GWI studies have found abnormalities of cholinergic brain function, others have also found abnormalities in the brainstem of Gulf War veterans with GWI, and important theories of chronic pain involve abnormalities in “gating.”

Haley has long argued that even low-level exposure to chemicals -- including organophosphate (OP) pesticides and sarin nerve agent released at the Khamisiyah ammo dump detonations by U.S. troops in southeastern Iraq in March 1991 -- are the root cause of the brain damage and resulting disease state of ill Gulf War veterans.


Conclusions

Dr. Haley stressed the need to learn the underlying mechanisms of the disease.  He said there is hope in the scientific commmunity that as with other diseases, trial and error may lead to effective treatments.  However, he stressed the need to more precisely understand the underlying pathobiology, becuase, he said, “if we don’t stumble on a treatment, we are going to need to find one.”

He also stressed the need for a relatively quick diagnostic test to determine if veterans have GWI, or something else.  As have other medical researchers, he noted that this is important not only for benefits purposes and peace of mind, but also for treatment purposes and potentially in the future to help validate the effectiveness of treatment.


*****

Additional Sources:
Jamal et al 1996, finding two-fol increase in cooling detection threshold during QST in British GWI GWVs.  

1998 Haley study UT-S confirmed Jamal, then undertook several studies of possible mechanisms of sensory and pain handling.  

Haley et al 2009.  Infused physostigmine, found “abnormal brain response to cholinergic challenge in chronic encephalopathy from the 1991 Gulf War”.  

Li et al, 2008.  Hippocampal dysfunction in Gulf War veterans: investigation with ASL perfusion MRI and physostigmine challenge.

Tillman G et al, 2012. Auditory stimuli in fEEG protocol.  

Monday, June 18, 2012

New UW Research Provides Images of Brain Dysfunction in ill Gulf War Veterans

Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes.com



(91outcomes.com) - Cutting edge research from the University of Wisconsin-Madison is providing new pictorial evidence of marked brain dysregulation in Gulf War veterans suffering from chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain (CMP), one of the most commonly reported symptoms of Gulf War Illness.  

According to lead researcher Dr. Dane Cook of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Madison VA Hospital, his research team’s findings also suggest potential avenues for treatment aimed at “resettting” the dysregulated functioning in the brains of ill Gulf War veterans.

Cook’s team’s findings, including powerful images of important brain functional differences, were presented at the opening of public meetings being held this week by the Congressionally chartered Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses (RAC-GWVI) at the Boston University Medical Center in Boston, Mass.

In addition to new preliminary findings, Cook presented excerpts of his team’s past research and related research on fibromyalgia (a disease characterized by chronic widespread pain).  Much of Cook’s team’s work has focused on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the brains of Gulf War veterans, including before and after exercise, and during application of painful stimuli.    

Cook says his data show the functioning of the brains of his principal study subjects -- Gulf War veterans who have chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) -- differ in important ways from healthy study subjects.  For the purposes of the studies, “Chronic” was defined as long-term, with pain unrelenting for at least six months or longer; most of the study subjects have been experiencing pain for many years.  The pain must also have been widespread, affecting at least three of four body quadrants, so as to rule out a localized injury where pain only affects one part of the body.  

The research results show that Gulf War veterans with CMP are significantly more sensitive to heat pain than healthy Gulf War veteran controls, and fMRI images provide objective confirmation of this.  And, this hypersensitivity to heat pain is magnified following exercise in the Gulf War veterans with CMP, in some cases as much as tripling.  For the healthy Gulf War veterans, sensitivity to heat pain did not change relative to before and after exercise.

Cook said the research findings, including detailed fMRI pictures are, “suggestive of less white matter integrity [density] in the brain,” meaning the brain is not functioning normally in the ill veterans.  

Cook’s research also looked at fatigue in his Gulf War veteran subjects, another major Gulf War Illness symptom.  He said his team’s findings show that the greater the feelings of fatigue in the ill patients, the less the white matter integrity [density]  in brain regions known to be central to pain processing.   In general, Gulf War veterans with CMP show decreased brain white matter integrity (density; “lower FA and higher MD”) in several regions of the brain associated with fatigue and pain processing.  Cook said these objective brain imaging and correlated findings are suggestive of altered communication along spinal tracts that are involved in pain processing and pain modulation.  

Dr. Cook’s team has also been working to examine similarities and differences between fibromyalgia patients and Gulf War veterans with CMP.  In a 2012 study (Shields et al), FM patients’ brains were found to be unable to communicate between brain regions to properly regulate pain.  FM patients were found to be more sensitive to all types of pain, and their brains less able to regulate pain properly.  Interestingly, Dr. Cook’s research has shown Gulf War veterans with CMP show excessive pain sensitivity to one type of painful stimuli -- heat pain -- but not to another, pressure pain.  According to Dr. Cook, the body of fibromyalgia research shows fibromyalgia (FM) patients have hypersensitivity to both heat pain and pressure pain, an important difference between the two groups. ''



And, his team’s research hopes to show whether Gulf War veterans are similar to fibromyalgia patients in another area, too. Research shows that FM patients who are more sedentary -- those who sit for at least 60 minutes at a time during their daily lives, as measured during extended testing -- exhibited more pain processing dysregulation in the brain.  Whether this sedentary behavior is a symptom or -- or is part of the cause of FM's worsened pain symptoms -- remains unclear.  However, Cook expressed hope that additional research related to exercise therapies should help resolve this question.  

Cook suggested that areas for future treatment exploration might include, “anything that might help reset a dysregulated [pain regulation] system” in the brain and central nervous system, including brain stimulation methods.

Friday, June 15, 2012

Corrections to Factually Incorrect Law Firm Article about GWI Funding

Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes


(91outcomes.com) -- A Florida-based law firm aimed at helping veterans has gotten an article about the federal government's Gulf War Illness medical research funding completely wrong, leading to confusion among many Gulf War veterans.

Here's the response back to them, which corrects the many errors:


This is regarding your recent article about Gulf War Illness funding, which is riddled with factual inaccuracies, some of which are 180 degrees opposite of what actually happened.
I understand your firm -- like several others that work to help veterans with their claims -- is providing this kind of news as a service. However, this level of factual inaccuracy begs the question, Is this an indication of the level of service your firm provides to veterans?
First, the Barrow amendment -- and Rep. Barrow himself -- never mentioned or addressed anything related to Gulf War Illness or Gulf War veterans.  The Barrow amendment was merely a proposed (failed by the vote noted in the article) funding increase to the VA's overall research budget to match the *overall VA research* funding levels requested in the VSOs' Independent Budget.   
Contrary to what your article says, the VSOs did not recommend a specific dollar amount for GWI funding (for GWI CDMRP funding in the DoD appropriations bill), and their mention in the context of GWI funding is incorrect and entirely false.  
The amount passed by the House matches the VA's FY13 overall research budget request, which decreases funding for GWI research from $15m to $4.862m.   However, neither Rep. Barrow nor the House specifically mention GWI research (or any other type of research) in their funding, with the exceptions noted below.
The numbers you have included in this article, about some increase from $10m to $25m, are entirely unrelated to the VA budget, the VA-HUD appropriations act passed by the House, or the Barrow Amendment to FY13 VA-HUD.   The House Appropriations Committee previously passed out of committee the FY13 Defense Appropriations Act, which contained $10m in GWI medical research funding under the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP).  Gulf War veterans' goal is $25m.  The full House has not yet taken action on that bill, which is under a veto threat from the White House.  Your article confuses VA research funding with DoD GWI CDMRP research funding; the two are entirely separate, distinct, and unrelated.
Furthermore, the bill's accompanying report *DID* include the direction to VA to prioritize FGID research, and burn pits.  These were not part of the failed Barrow amendment.  So, your article has it 180 degrees backwards, these measures *passed*, not failed as your article states.
Finally, the funding addressed by VA-HUD and the Barrow Amendment is FY13, not "2012".  
It is rare that I see a short article with so many completely false statements and getting it completely wrong.  I understand you're trying to help veterans, so I ask you all the more urgently, please, get your facts straight.  I've been busy correcting Gulf War veterans who saw your article and believed it.  You do a great disservice to veterans when you write patently false news like this.  
If you have any questions or wish to discuss, please feel free to contact me.  I'm one of the people who remain closely engaged in GWI advocacy issues on the Hill.  As such, I'm happy to help you get your facts straight before putting something awful and damaging and completely factually inaccurate like your article above.  
Thank you.
Anthony Hardie
Madison, Wis.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Gulf War, Other Younger Veterans Have Three Times Greater Urinary Incontinence

Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes.com


(91outcomes.com) - A new medical journal article reports that Gulf War and other veterans age 55 and younger are almost three times more likely to report urinary incontinence than their civilian counterparts.

According to the article by Michele Sullivan, reported in Clinical Psychiatry News:

[Urinary] Urgency was the most common problem, reported by 15% of veterans and 8% of civilians. The rates of stress and mixed incontinence were 4% and 2%, respectively.
Moderate to severe symptoms also were more common among the veterans (19% vs. 3%), whereas 1% of each group reported severe incontinence.
However, Dr. Markland said, when the group was broken down by age, the youngest group was driving the difference. Men aged 55 years and younger were three times more likely to report any urinary incontinence than were the nonmilitary population. The difference remained significant even after investigators controlled for ethnicity, socioeconomic level, body mass index, diabetes, and heart disease.

Dr. Markland is an internal medicine doctor at the Birmingham, Ala. VA Medical Center.   She says that, "there’s no way to tease out any cause and effect information."  


Monday, June 11, 2012

House GOP Pursues Contempt of Congress Charges Related to Document Release


This article is from MSNBC First Read, http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/11/12167268-house-gopers-to-pursue-contempt-of-congress-against-holder?lite 

Contempt of Congress can involve refusal to cooperate with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee, including providing testimony or requested documents.


********

House GOPers to pursue contempt of Congress against Holder

According to an aide at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the committee will proceed with a motion on June 20 to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress in relation to the investigation into the so-called "Fast and Furious" gun-running operation.

Charles Dharapak / AP
Attorney General Eric Holder testifies on Capitol Hill, Thursday, June 7, 2012, before the House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on the Justice Department.
The motion will have to pass through committee before it sees a full vote in the House.
The AP reports that House Republicans are pursuing this motion against Holder "for failing to produce some documents the panel is seeking.... To date, the the Justice Department has produced 7,600 pages of documents to the committee."

More from the AP:
Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, says Congress needs to examine records regarding the Justice Department's conduct following public disclosures in early 2011 that hundreds of guns illicitly purchased at gun shops on the U.S. side of the border wound up in Mexico, many of them at crime scenes.
The Justice Department says many of the documents deal with open criminal investigations and prosecutions -- matters relating to sensitive law enforcement activities that cannot be disclosed.
If found in contempt of Congress, punishments can range from jail time, to fines, to probation, but it typically does not get that far.Contempt of Congress is used when the House or Senate wants to punish a recalcitrant witness for not complying with an investigation and, by doing so, is done to deter others from similar conduct.
If the committee passes this motion to proceed June 20, it is then sent to the full House of Representatives for a vote. If it passes through the full House, it then is referred to the U.S. Attorney.

Two recent contempt of Congress considerations:

2008: Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee found White House counsel Harriet Miers and Chief of Staff John Bolton in contempt for not cooperating with an investigation into possible political motivation in the handling of federal prosecutors by the Bush adminstration. The full House passed the measure, but most Republicans (including Boehner and Issa) boycotted the vote.
1998: Janet Reno was found in contempt of Congress by Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee for not complying with a subpoena regarding possible campaign-finance law violations. The full House never voted on the measure after the documents they had requested were turned over.

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Bill Introduced to Create National Desert Storm War Memorial

The legislation to create the National Desert Storm War Memorial is authored by Rep. Phil Roe, M.D. (R-Tenn.). This article is from http://wap.myfoxhouston.com/w/news-top/story/63583667/ Long overdue memorial for Gulf War veterans Jun 8, 2012 10:17 p.m. It has been more than 21 years since the end of the first Gulf War. And some say it is long overdue for a permanent landmark in our nation's capital. That effort took a big step forward on Thursday with the filing of a bill in the US Congress to commemorate Americans who served and died back in 1991. "It's HR 5914, which is going to create a national Desert Storm/Desert Shield war memorial in Washington D.C.," said Scott Stump, the president of the National Desert Storm War Memorial Association. Today, we remember Desert Storm as a 100-hour ground conflict with minimal casualties. That's if we remember it, at all. But at the time, there were real fears Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard would put up a fierce fight, perhaps with chemical weaponry. "There were thousands upon thousands of body bags up at Dover Air Force Base waiting to be filled," recalled Stump, who logged 5 months in a Marine Corps infantry unit during the conflict. "Everybody was on high alert. We were really expecting the worst case scenario, or we were prepared for the worst case scenario." It was a scenario that never materialized. With the US in the lead, the Coalition victory was quick and decisive. "Fortunately, not many were killed," said Rice University political science professor Ric Stoll. "But some people made the ultimate sacrifice for the United States and I think it's perfectly appropriate that we should commemorate that." In Stoll's opinion, Coalition casualties should not be the sole metric in assessing the first Gulf War and whether it is deserving of a permanent memorial. After all, there were lingering costs. "Gulf War Syndrome," for example, affected more than 30 percent of the almost 700,000 US troops, to varying degrees. "A lot of people were hurt by that war," explained Stoll, "even if they weren't wounded in battle, even if they weren't killed." And don't forget, says Stump: Desert Storm helped wipe away America's lingering military insecurities, after Vietnam. "Something (is) needed...in Washington as a lasting reminder of what was accomplished way back when," he said. FOX 26 News was unsuccessful in getting reaction on Friday from former President George H.W. Bush, who prosecuted the first Gulf War. But Scott Stump believes the bill establishing a Desert Storm war memorial should be an easy sell in Congress, since it would be funded entirely by donations and not tax dollars. For more information on the National Desert Storm War Memorial Association, click here: http://www.nationaldesertstormwarmemorial.org/

Friday, June 1, 2012

House Passes VA Budget with two-thirds GWI research cut intact but Urges VA to Prioritize Gulf War Syndrome Gastrointestinal Disorders, Burn Pits Research



Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes.com

(91outcomes.com) - The Republican controlled U.S. House of Representatives yesterday passed a VA appropriations bill by a vote of 407-12 that mirrors the Administration's $582,674,000 request for prosthetics and other medical research.

The funding falls far short of the $611 million recommended in The Independent Budget by AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans (DAV), Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA), and the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), four of the nation's largest and most influential veterans service organizations.  Along with nearly 60 other veterans, health, and other advocacy organizations, the four make annual recommendations independent of VA, as their budget document's title implies, usually at amounts substantially larger than what VA requests.  

Several of the veterans service organizations have sharply criticized the Administration's low-balled research budget.  An amendment proposed by Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.) that would have increased the medical research funding by the amount recommended in The Independent Budget, $28.3 million, failed along party lines by a vote of 188-230.

Of potential impact on the one-third of veterans of the 1991 Gulf War afflicted by Gulf War Illness, a debilitating, chronic multi-symptom illness, a House Appropriations Committee report accompanying the bill specifically urged VA to to prioritize research on functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and Gulf War syndrome.

Gastrointestinal disorders and Gulf War syndrome- The Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified a link between Gulf War service and the development of functional gastrointestinal disorders in its 2010 report on Gulf War service and health. These disorders can be painful and debilitating for veterans, and the Committee urges VA to prioritize this important research area. (1)

However, neither the Committee nor the full House added funding to the VA's Gulf War Illness research budget, which was quietly recommended for a two-thirds cut by VA officials.  The House bill appears to have retained the unprecedented cut.

The House had strong words for the VA regarding the respiratory effects of exposure to burn pits, which are quickly becoming another signature injury for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and an area long left under-researched by VA for earlier eras of veterans.  

Respiratory exposures/burn pits.—There is a reported increase in
respiratory conditions such as atypical pneumonias, asthma and
bronchiolitis among military personnel who were exposed to burn
pits, increased particulate matter and other potential hazards
while serving in Iraq, Kuwait, and Afghanistan. The Committee
notes the research recommendations in the IOM report entitled
‘‘Long-Term Health Consequences of Exposure to Burn Pits in Iraq
and Afghanistan’’ and encourages the Department to allocate the
resources needed to address the key research questions identified
by the IOM report. (1)
The FY13 Defense appropriations bill remains stalled in the House.  The House Appropriations Committee included $10 million in funding for the treatment focused, peer reviewed Gulf War Illness Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program.  

While the recommended funding was the same as the previous year, Gulf War veteran advocates have sought an increase to $25 million to pay for three cutting edge, interdisciplinary, inter-institutional consortia developed with earlier funding and to offset the two-thirds cut to the VA's GWI medical research budget.  

Earlier this year, nearly 60 Democratic members of the House joined perennial lead author Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Oh.) in calling for the funding to be increased to $25 million. Six Republican members, including House Veterans' Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) joined Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) in calling for the program to be continued at "adequate" levels.  

It remains to be seen whether a House champion can be found to lead an amendment to the House bill that would add the much needed GWI medical research funds.


*****





Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Two UC-San Diego Researchers Aim to Help Gulf War Veterans with Gulf War Illness

"This is just as much about future combat operations as it is about the past"


Healthy and Ill 1991 Gulf War Veteran Research Study Participants Needed



Written by Anthony Hardie, 91outcomes.com

(91outcomes.com) -  Two medical research researchers at the University of California-San Diego are aiming to help veterans of the 1991 Gulf War suffering from Gulf War Illness by working to improve the scientific understanding of precisely what is going on in GWI patients' bodies.

One of the unrelated UCSD medical research projects is led by Dr. Beatrice Golomb, whose groundbreaking study found CoQ10 to be the first treatment proven successful in reducing some of GWI's symptoms, including post-exertional fatigue.  She is also the author of a 1990s RAND Institute study on Pyridostigmine Bromide (PB) anti-nerve agent protective pills, which found PB to be associated with Gulf War Illness patients' adverse health outcomes.  

The second is led by Dr. Bruce Zuraw, a widely published Professor of Medicine at the UCSD Medical School and Program Director of the UCSD Allergy and Immunology Fellowship Program.  His research interests include allergic inflammation in humans.  

Both medical research projects studies received their funding separately from the peer reviewed Gulf War Illness (GWI) Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP), an activity of the U.S. Department of Defense that receives its specific direction, peer review requirements, and funding on an annual basis from Congress.  


Dr. Beatrice Golomb: Developing a Biomarker for Oxidative Damage in GWI

The first UCSD study is led by Dr. Beatrice Golomb and is a follow-on to her landmark CoQ10 GWI treatment study.  CoQ10 is believed to be effective because it helps alleviate ongoing oxidative damage at the cellular level, called "oxidative stress".  

Dr. Golomb's new study is seeking 40 participants -- all ill -- and this time involves measuring the oxidative damage resulting in Gulf War veterans with GWI.  

Entitled simply "Oxidative Stress"(GW093063), this study will look at potential oxidative damage biomarkers for GWI taken from samples of a blood draw and excreted in the urine.  

The study is narrowly focused.  Study participants must:
  • Be a Veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces; and
  • Have U.S. military service service in the Persian Gulf Region at any time during the one-year period commencing August 2, 1990 and ending July 31, 1991; and
  • Be between the ages of 35 and 73; and
  • Meet recognized diagnostic criteria for Gulf War Illness (to be determined by the study team).

Participation involves a short telephone interview and in-person testing during a visit of about 3 hours to the UCSD campus.  


Dr. Bruce Zuraw: Developing a Biomarker for GWI with Respiratory Symptoms

The second UCSD GWI study, focused on respiratory issues inherent in many GWI patients' disease, is slightly larger and is seeking 60 veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, including 30 "healthy" and 30 "ill" veterans.  

The study is being led by Bruce Zuraw, M.D. of the Veterans Medical Research Foundation of San Diego, and is entitled "Epithelial Cell TRPV1-Mediated Airway Sensitivity as a Mechanism for Respiratory Symptoms Associated with Gulf War Illness (GW080156).”

Dr. Zuraw is hoping the project will help determine a possible test for diagnosing GWI with respiratory symptoms (a distinction he terms, "GWI-R").  No such test currently exists, making it difficult to distinguish between GWI or GWI-R and other chronic multisymptom illness conditions for which causes -- and perhaps more importantly, treatments -- may be wildly different.  

According to a San Diego Union-Times article about his study:

Zuraw and his research team are focusing on Gulf War illnesses featuring respiratory problems, drawing on his work as director of the Allergy and Immunology Section at both the VA San Diego Healthcare System and the University of California San Diego.  Researchers have noticed that Gulf War veterans often have symptoms of inflammatory lung diseases such as asthma or chronic bronchitis, but they test negative for them.  The paradox led the San Diego team to an examination of transient receptor potential channels, or TRPs, in the lining of the lungs and nerves, and their role in increased airway sensitivity. They hypothesize that in patients with Gulf War illness, the receptors are locked in a harmful cycle: receptors in the epithelial cells of the lungs alert the nerves, the resulting nerve response irritates the lining of the lung, and the process repeats indefinitely, resulting in respiratory distress.  By isolating and documenting the interplay, they hope to create a means of diagnosing a distinct illness, and perhaps a means of stopping the cycle and its irritating effect on the lungs.  .... “It’s a gift when veterans offer their time to clinical research,” said Kerstin Lynam, the CEO of Veterans Medical Research Foundation. “Only through their participation can we learn more about this evasive disease.


Congress Directs the Funding

The result of an odd twist of events, most Gulf War Illness research is now being conducted outside the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the agency that purports to be veterans' "chief advocate".
Gulf War veteran activists recently discovered an unannounced, two-thirds budget cut in the VA's current budget proposal, which would reduced already limited GWI medical research at VA to less than $5 million annually.  By contrast, peer reviewed treatment-focused GWI research was funded by Congress in the Department of Defense at $10 million last year.

As the name would suggest, Congress specifically directs the funding for the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, which is administered by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command at Ft. Detrick, Maryland.  

Programs within the CDMRP portfolio are generally created by Congress at the request of patients suffering from a disease or disorder, and the GWI programs are no different.  Created under the Fiscal Year 2006 Defense Appropriations Act, the GWI program has existed -- and grown -- ever since.  Gulf War veterans sought the creation of the GWI CDMRP, and Gulf War Illness patients and their advocates are active in the program's annual funding decisions by Congress. 

Funding decisions about individually submitted medical research proposals are determined through a multi-tiered process that includes Congressionally-mandated peer review -- review of each proposal's merits by other members of the scientific community.  CDMRP programs also include consumer reviewers -- individuals affected by the specific disease or condition -- at every step of the process.  

Congressional language authorizing the GWI CDMRP program has remained unchanged over the years.  It is perhaps most notable for what kinds of medical research studies are allowed -- "studies of treatments" and "identification of objective markers for [GWI]" -- and what are not -- "no studies based on psychiatric illness and psychological stress as the central cause of Gulf War Illness". 

The committee directs the Secretary of the Army to utilize the authorized funding for this program to undertake research on Gulf War illnesses. The committee directs that activities under the program should include studies of treatments for the complex of symptoms commonly referred to as Gulf War Illness, and identification of objective markers for Gulf War Illness. The committee recommends that no studies based on psychiatric illness and psychological stress as the central cause of Gulf War Illness be funded under the program. The committee directs that the program be conducted using competitive selection and peer review for the identification of research with the highest technical merit and military value. Further, the committee directs that this program be coordinated with similar activities in the Department of Veterans Affairs and the National Institutes of Health.

In April 2010, the highly reputable Institute of Medicine issue a report that found Gulf War Illness to be a unique diagnostic condition that affects about 250,000 veterans of the 1991 Gulf War as well as other U.S. Forces.

John, a former military police Gulf War veteran from Washington State in his early 40s who asked that his last name be withheld to protect his medical privacy, agreed to be interviewed by the San Diego newspaper staff and supported the study, seemed to agree with those last six words, "as well as other U.S. forces."  

"This is just as much about future combat operations as it is about the past," John told the reporters.

**********

TO PARTICIPATE

If you are a U.S. military veteran of the 1991 Gulf War (Aug. 2, 1990 - Jul. 31, 1991), you appear to meet the basic study criteria information, and you’re willing and able to participate:

For the new Golomb study at UCSD:
  • Call:  (858) 558-4950 extension 203 (Janis) or 210 (Kate)
  • Email:  jbritchie@ucsd.edu or cbloom@ucsd.edu
  • A small compensation stipend is provided; travel is not covered.

For the Zuraw study at UCSD:
  • Call (858) 822-6599
  • Gulf War veterans who are both ill (with Gulf War Illness and GWI-related respiratory symptoms) and healthy are needed.
  • A small compensation stipend is provided; travel is not covered.


Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Memorial Day Remarks on Vietnam War 50th Ring Hollow for Gulf War Illness Veterans

Below is the President's speech on Memorial Day 2012, at the Vietnam Wall, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War.   


The White House would do well to recognize that veterans of the 1991 Gulf War have largely been forgotten, their all too real Gulf War Illness still dismissed by far too many within the VA.


There is much left to do for Gulf War veterans, yet rather than moving forward, it now looks like Gulf War veterans are being left to slide back down the hill into the dark valley where for years they were ignored and ridiculed by successive Administrations' VA bureaucrats.  


Evidence for this retranchement is an unannounced two-thirds budget cuts by for Gulf Illness research in the current VA budget proposal, outright ignoring the Congressionally chartered research body entrusted with oversight of GWI and Gulf War health research, and extended foot-dragging on what might eventually -- more than 21 years later -- be the first of its kind GWI medical research strategic plan.  Add to that precious little GWI research from VA, an apparent refusal by VA to formally cooperate with the one successful GWI medical research program ever created in the federal government -- the treatment-focused, peer reviewed GWI Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program -- and complicity in a recent Institute of Medicine presentation on GWI in which five of the eight presenters were focused on stress and psychosomatic "causes" of GWI, a case long closed as acknowledged by an earlier, definitive 2010 IOM report that found GWI was not only a unique diagnosis that affected 250,000 of the 697,000 Gulf War veterans but could not be ascribed to any psychiatric cause.  


For countless thousands of Gulf War veterans, their enduring -- and in many cases substantially worsening -- Gulf War Illness issues began while still in the Gulf more than 21 years ago.  They've been up front about their issue since the get go, and Congress has gotten tougher and tougher on VA and DoD over the years at it became apparent that a cabal of unaccountable bureaucrats have been and remain dead set against assisting them in any kind of meaningful way beyond counting them or the number of their symptoms and the growing numbers of their resultant diagnosed conditions.


The White House would do well to recognize that actions speak louder than words, and Gulf War veterans, hearing these flowery words regarding Vietnam Veterans this weekend, are all ears.


Gulf War veterans don't need apologies -- they need competent administrators willing to make whatever choices are necessary to remedy their debilitating health conditions and the growing number of wounds inflicted by VA officials -- past and present.  

-A.H., 91outcomes.com


************

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at the Commemoration Ceremony of the 50th Anniversary of the Vietnam War

The Vietnam War Memorial
National Mall
Washington, D.C.
2:27 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT:  Good afternoon, everybody.  Chuck, thank you for your words and your friendship and your life of service.  Veterans of the Vietnam War, families, friends, distinguished guests.  I know it is hot.  (Laughter.)  But you are here -- to honor your loved ones.  And Michelle and I could not be more honored to be here with you. 
It speaks to the complexity of America’s time in Vietnam that, even now, historians cannot agree on precisely when the war began.  American advisors had served there, and died there, as early as the mid-'50s.  Major combat operations would not begin until the mid-'60s.  But if any year in between illustrated the changing nature of our involvement, it was 1962.
It was January, in Saigon.  Our Army pilots strapped on their helmets and boarded their helicopters.  They lifted off, raced over treetops carrying South Vietnamese troops.  It was a single raid against an enemy stronghold just a few miles into the jungle -- but it was one of America’s first major operations in that faraway land.
Fifty years later, we come to this wall -- to this sacred place -- to remember.  We can step towards its granite wall and reach out, touch a name.  Today is Memorial Day, when we recall all those who gave everything in the darkness of war so we could stand here in the glory of spring.  And today begins the 50th commemoration of our war in Vietnam.  We honor each of those names etched in stone -- 58,282 American patriots.  We salute all who served with them.  And we stand with the families who love them still.  
For years you've come here, to be with them once more.  And in the simple things you’ve left behind -- your offerings, your mementos, your gifts -- we get a glimpse of the lives they led.  The blanket that covered him as a baby.  The baseball bat he swung as a boy.  A wedding ring.  The photo of the grandchild he never met.  The boots he wore, still caked in mud.  The medals she earned, still shining.  And, of course, some of the things left here have special meaning, known only to the veterans -- a can of beer; a packet of M&Ms; a container of Spam; an old field ration -- still good, still awful.  (Laughter.)          
It's here we feel the depth of your sacrifice.  And here we see a piece of our larger American story.  Our Founders -- in their genius -- gave us a task.  They set out to make a more perfect union.  And so it falls to every generation to carry on that work.  To keep moving forward.  To overcome a sometimes painful past.  To keep striving for our ideals. 
And one of the most painful chapters in our history was Vietnam -- most particularly, how we treated our troops who served there.  You were often blamed for a war you didn’t start, when you should have been commended for serving your country with valor.  (Applause.)  You were sometimes blamed for misdeeds of a few, when the honorable service of the many should have been praised.  You came home and sometimes were denigrated, when you should have been celebrated.  It was a national shame, a disgrace that should have never happened.  And that's why here today we resolve that it will not happen again.  (Applause.)    
And so a central part of this 50th anniversary will be to tell your story as it should have been told all along.  It’s another chance to set the record straight.  That's one more way we keep perfecting our Union -- setting the record straight.  And it starts today.  Because history will honor your service, and your names will join a story of service that stretches back two centuries.
Let us tell the story of a generation of servicemembers -- every color, every creed, rich, poor, officer and enlisted -- who served with just as much patriotism and honor as any before you. Let’s never forget that most of those who served in Vietnam did so by choice.  So many of you volunteered.  Your country was at war, and you said, "send me."  That includes our women in Vietnam -- every one of you a volunteer.  (Applause.)  Those who were drafted, they, too, went and carried their burden -- you served; you did your duty.
You persevered though some of the most brutal conditions ever faced by Americans in war.  The suffocating heat.  The drenching monsoon rains.  An enemy that could come out of nowhere and vanish just as quickly.  Some of the most intense urban combat in history, and battles for a single hill that could rage for weeks.  Let it be said -- in those hellholes like Briarpatch, and the Zoo and the Hanoi Hilton -- our Vietnam POWs didn’t simply endure; you wrote one of the most extraordinary stories of bravery and integrity in the annals of military history.  (Applause.)  
As a nation, we've long celebrated the courage of our forces at Normandy and Iwo Jima, the Pusan Perimeter and Heartbreak Ridge.  So let us also speak of your courage -- at Hue and Khe Sanh, at Tan Son Nhut and Saigon, from Hamburger Hill to Rolling Thunder.  All too often it's forgotten that you, our troops in Vietnam, won every major battle you fought in.  (Applause.)
When you came home, I know many of you put your medals away -- tucked them in a drawer, or in a box in the closet.  You went on with your lives -- started families and pursued careers.  A lot of you didn’t talk too much about your service.  As a consequence, this nation has not always fully appreciated the chapter of your lives that came next. 
So let us also tell a story of a generation that came home, and how -- even though some Americans turned their back on you -- you never turned your back on America.  (Applause.)  Like generations before you, you took off the uniform, but you never stopped serving.  You became teachers and police officers and nurses -- the folks we count on every single day.  You became entrepreneurs, running companies and pioneering industries that changed the world.  You became leaders and public servants, from town halls to Capitol Hill -- lifting up our communities, our states, our nation. 
You reminded us what it was like to serve, what it meant to serve.  Those of you who stayed in uniform, you rose through the ranks, became leaders in every service, learned from your experience in Vietnam and rebuilt our military into the finest force that the world has ever known.  (Applause.)  And let’s remember all those Vietnam veterans who came back and served again -- in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  You did not stop serving.  (Applause.) 
Even as you succeeded in all these endeavors, you did something more -- maybe the most important thing you did -- you looked after each other.  When your government didn’t live up to its responsibilities, you spoke out -- fighting for the care and benefits you had earned, and, over time, transforming the VA.  And, of course, one of these Vietnam veterans is now our outstanding Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Ric Shinseki.  (Applause.)
You looked after one another.  You cared for one another.  People weren’t always talking about PTSD at the time -- you understood it, and you were there for each other.  Just as importantly, you didn’t just take care of your own, you cared for those that followed.  You’ve made it your mission to make sure today’s troops get the respect and support that all too often you did not receive.  (Applause.)  
Because of you, because our Vietnam veterans led the charge, the Post-9/11 GI Bill is helping hundreds of thousands of today’s veterans go to college and pursue their dreams.  (Applause.)  Because of you, because you didn’t let us forget, at our airports, our returning troops get off the airplane and you are there to shake their hands.  (Applause.)  Because of you, across America, communities have welcomed home our forces from Iraq.  And when our troops return from Afghanistan, America will give this entire 9/11 Generation the welcome home they deserve.  That happened in part because of you.  (Applause.)
This is the story of our Vietnam servicemembers -- the story that needs to be told.  This is what this 50th anniversary is all about.  It’s another opportunity to say to our Vietnam veterans what we should have been saying from the beginning:  You did your job.  You served with honor.  You made us proud.  You came home and you helped build the America that we love and that we cherish.
So here today, it must be said -- you have earned your place among the greatest generations.  At this time, I would ask all our Vietnam veterans, those of you who can stand, to please stand, all those already standing, raise your hands -- as we say those simple words which always greet our troops when they come home from here on out:  Welcome home.  (Applause.)  Welcome home. Welcome home.  Welcome home.  Thank you.  We appreciate you.  Welcome home.  (Applause.) 
Today, we’re calling on all Americans, and every segment of our society, to join this effort.  Everybody can do something.  Five decades removed from a time of division among Americans, this anniversary can remind us of what we share as Americans.  That includes honoring our Vietnam veterans by never forgetting the lessons of that war. 
So let us resolve that when America sends our sons and daughters into harm’s way, we will always give them a clear mission; we will always give them a sound strategy; we will give them the equipment they need to get the job done.  We will have their backs.  (Applause.)  We will resolve that leaders will be candid about the risks and about progress -- and have a plan to bring our troops home, with honor.
Let us resolve to never forget the costs of war, including the terrible loss of innocent civilians -- not just in Vietnam, but in all wars.  For we know that while your sacrifice and service is the very definition of glory, war itself is not glorious.  We hate war.  When we fight, we do so to protect ourselves because it's necessary.
Let’s resolve that in our democracy we can debate and disagree -- even in a time of war.  But let us never use patriotism as a political sword.  Patriots can support a war; patriots can oppose a war.  And whatever our view, let us always stand united in support of our troops, who we placed in harm's way.  (Applause.)  That is our solemn obligation.  (Applause.)   
Let’s resolve to take care of our veterans as well as they’ve taken care of us -- not just talk, but actions.  Not just in the first five years after a war, but the first five decades. For our Vietnam veterans, this means the disability benefits for diseases connected to Agent Orange.  It means job opportunities and mental health care to help you stand tall again.  It means ending the tragedy of veterans' homelessness, so that every veteran who has fought for America has a home in America.  You shouldn’t have to fight for a roof over your heads when you fought on behalf of the country that you love.  (Applause.) 
And when an American does not come back -- including the 1,666 Americans still missing from the Vietnam War -- let us resolve to do everything in our power to bring them home.  This is our solemn promise to mothers like Sarah Shay who joins us today, 93 years old, who has honored her son, Major Donald Shay, Jr., missing in action for 42 years.  There she is.  Sarah, thank you for your courage.  God bless you.  (Applause.)
This is the promise we’re fulfilling today to the Meroney family of Fayetteville, Arkansas.  Forty-three years after he went missing, we can announce that Army Captain Virgil Meroney, III, is coming home, and he will finally rest in peace.  (Applause.)
Some have called this war era a scar on our country, but here’s what I say.  As any wound heals, the tissue around it becomes tougher, becomes stronger than before.  And in this sense, finally, we might begin to see the true legacy of Vietnam. Because of Vietnam and our veterans, we now use American power smarter, we honor our military more, we take care of our veterans better.  Because of the hard lessons of Vietnam, because of you, America is even stronger than before.  (Applause.)     
And finally, on this anniversary and all the years to come, let us remember what binds us, as one people.  This is important for all of us, whether you fought in the Vietnam War or fought against it, whether you were too young to be shaped by it.  It is important that our children understand the sacrifices that were made by your troops in Vietnam; that for them, this is more than just a name in history books.  It’s important that we know the lesson of a gift once left at this Memorial. 
It was towards the end of the day, and most of the tourists and visitors had departed.  And there it was -- a football helmet, black with white stripes, and a wristband.  And with them was a handwritten note.  And it was from a young man, still in high school.  And mind you, this was more than two decades after Vietnam.  That high school student was born years after the war had already ended.  But in that short, handwritten note he captured the reverence -- the bonds between generations -- that bring us here today.  
The letter began, "Dear Vietnam Veterans, here are two things from me to you that I think you should have."   He explained that it was his helmet from midget football and his wristband from his senior year.  So today I want to close with the words he wrote:
In these two pieces of equipment, I was allowed to make mistakes, correct them, grow and mature as a person.  However, that was on my battlefield.  You didn’t get the chance to do that on your battlefield.  Some of you were forced to grow up too fast; all of you died too soon.  We do have many things in common, though.  We both have pride, heart and determination.  I'm just sorry you guys had to learn those qualities too fast.  That is why I'm giving you what I grew up with.  You are true heroes and you will never be forgotten.
That's from a high school kid, born decades after the end of the war.  And that captures the spirit that this entire country should embrace.
Veterans, families of the Vietnam War, I know the wounds of war are slow to heal.  You know that better than most.  But today we take another step.  The task of telling your story continues. The work of perfecting our Union goes on.  And decades from now, I hope another young American will visit this place and reach out and touch a name.  And she’ll learn the story of servicemembers  -- people she never met, who fought a war she never knew -- and in that moment of understanding and of gratitude and of grace, your legacy will endure.  For you are all true heroes and you will all be remembered. 
May God bless you.  May God bless your families.  May God bless our men and women in uniform.  And may God bless these United States of America.  (Applause.)
 END                   2:50 P.M. EDT